God is Not Pro-Life
I saw a bumper sticker the other day that made me laugh. It said, in bright readable letters: “God is Pro-Life.”
Really? I thought.
What are we supposed to go by? This assertion, so often made by the would-be moral police on the Religious Right? Or the assertions supposedly made by God himself and his followers and preserved in the pages of the Bible?
The Bible is supposed to be the inerrant word of God after all, and there is some pretty anti-life stuff in there. As religioustolerance.org summarizes, “These include religiously-motivated genocide, stoning non-virgin brides to death, burning some hookers alive, treating women as property, etc.”
I mean, nasty stuff. Not pro-life at all. Since we can’t ask God and the prophet business has dried up over the past few thousand years, let’s do the next best thing and flip through the Bible.
Things don’t begin well for the pro-life argument. Ezekiel 34:31 states:
“And ye my flock, the flock of my pasture, are men, and I am your God, saith the Lord GOD.”
Yes, only Jews are human to YHWH. The Nations (Gentiles) – in a word, everyone else – are beasts. You remember what Jesus said about them, don’t you? Swine and dogs.
Now of course, the situation is complicated by the fact of three competing monotheisms, all claiming to be descended from Abraham. Everyone knows the Jewish “Chosen People” spiel but there seems to be a lot of that going around.
Muslims point to Genesis 15:18 as proof that they got the prized covenant from Abraham via Abraham’s firstborn child Ishmael, son of Abraham and his second wife, Hagar. The Jewish claim rests on the assertion that God passed the covenant on to Isaac (Genesis 17:19-21), the son Abraham and main wife, Sarah. And of course, Christians believe it passed on to them via Jesus.
Which would be fine, but apparently this covenant is exclusive property. They can’t all have it.
And they hate each other for it. We’re used now to Christian attacks on Mohammed but in the Talmud, both Jesus and Mohammed are “dead dogs.” America’s Talibangelicals seem to hate Islam with the same fervor they once reserved for Judaism.
The result is the followers of the “god of love” have as much hate as the god they worship. If we judge the tree by its fruit, it’s clear that the god of love is no such thing. It is also clear that his stance is anything but pro-life.
Let’s climb up and look at the tree some more.
We don’t have to look far:
Exodus (22:20): “Whoever sacrifices to any god, save to the LORD only, shall be utterly destroyed.”
Ouch. Yeah, not so much pro-life.
And it’s not like Jesus steered away from this platform. Yes, old YHWH said you should hate your enemies (after all, he did) and Jesus said to love them, but for both the end-time scenario was the same.
Everyone else has gotta go. Off the planet.
It’s no wonder Christian conservatives feel comfortable saying the US is by and for Christians. That’s actually a step down from their God’s platform. Maybe we should be grateful they’re being so moderate.
It is really difficult to find this god who is pro-life in the pages of the Bible. It’s filled with atrocity after atrocity and many of them at God’s own command. It’s no wonder it has sometimes been called one long hate speech.
Look at Numbers 31:17, concerning the Midianites:
Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.
The god of human sexual trafficking.
Exodus 22:18: “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”
This is not very pro-life. It obviously means everyone who doesn’t follow YHWH needs to be killed.
Deuteronomy 32:9-43 is white hot in its opposition to non-believers, as is Deuteronomy 13:6-10:
If your brother, the son of your mother, or your son, or your daughter, or the wife of your bosom, or your friend who is as your own soul, entices you secretly, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods…you shall kill him; your hand shall be first against him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. You shall stone him to death with stones, because he sought to draw you away from the LORD your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.’
Is this pro-life?:
“If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. they must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads” (Leviticus 20:13).
And then there is always the pesky issue of human sacrifice. Can a pro-life god demand babies be sacrificed to him?
Exodus 22.29 literally, YHWH demanded human sacrifice as well: that of the first-born son:
Do not hold back offerings from your granaries or your vats. You must give me the firstborn of your sons. Do the same with your cattle and your sheep. Let them stay with their mothers for seven days, but give them to me on the eighth day.
Ezekiel (20.26) certainly takes God’s command literally:
“I let them become defiled through their gifts – the sacrifice of every firstborn – that I might fill them with horrors so they would know that I am the LORD.”
The ever-reviled Baal and Moloch have nothing on this guy.
Of course, some apologists claim that this was not literally sacrifice but only consecration. Problems arise, however, when we see for example how in 2 Kings 21.6 King Manasseh “sacrificed his own son to the fire.”
And Levicitus (27.28-29) makes clear this is sacrifice, not consecration:
But nothing that a man owns and devotes to the LORD – whether man or animal or family land – may be sold or redeemed; everything so devoted is most holy to the LORD. No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed; he must be put to death.
Then there is story of Jephthah, one of the Judges of Israel who lived in the time before the first king, who in fulfillment of a vow sacrificed his own daughter to God (Judges 11:29-39).
Did Jesus really change anything? No, not really.
(Luke 19:27):
“But as for these enemies of mine, who did not want me to reign over them, bring them here and slay them before me.”
Luke 14:26:
If any one comes to me and does not hate his own father and mother and wife and children and brothers and sisters, yes, and even his own life, he cannot be my disciple.”
The Bible has been used to support and justify all kinds of hate and intolerance and violence. Yes, the Bible gets misused and abused and misquoted and taken out of context but the ideas of hate are there; they are not invented. The hate is there and those who follow the Bible get as riled up by God’s speeches as people once did by Hitler’s.
But making statements like the one found on that bumper sticker is not based on any biblical evidence that I can find. Saying it doesn’t make it so, however convenient the wish might be for the so-called pro-life movement (otherwise known as the anti-mother movement) and taking it upon oneself to speak for “God” seems a risky undertaking.
The arguments used to advance this pro-life point of view are weak and general: Nehemiah 9:6 that God gives life to everything; Job 12:10 that God’s hand is in the life of every creature; Deuteronomy 30:19-20 where God tells the Jews to choose life over death. The argument that because God creates life he is pro-life is a weak one. He obviously also created death and later, we are to believe, sent his own son to be killed. And while Deuteronomy is used to promote the pro-life cause, as we have seen above just a couple passages later God is expounding a very pro-death point of view (Deuteronomy 32:9-43). The most mis-used passage relates to a very special person, and not to all people. That is Jeremiah 1:4-5: The word of the LORD came to me, saying, “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations.” A very special case, said nowhere to apply to humankind generally. In fact, it is a unique statement in the Bible.
You want abortion examples from the Bible? Hosea 9:11-16; Hosea 13:16; Numbers 5:11-21; Numbers 31:17; 2 Kings 15:16. You want the murder of infants? 1 Samuel 15:3; Psalms 135:8, 136:10; Psalms 137:9.
It would be more accurate for the bumper sticker to read: “God is anti-life” because if there is one thing God seems to love in the Old Testament, it’s murdering babies, inside and outside the womb.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson is the author of A Heathen’s Day, which since 2005 has addressed the life and thoughts of a modern day Heathen. He is also the founder of the Mos Maiorum Foundation (www.mosmaiorum.org) which is dedicated to the study and support of Paganism as ethnic religion and writes for PoliticusUSA (www.politicususa.com) 
This whole “pro-life” thing seems to be time-delimited anyway. The “right to life” begins at conception, but it apparently ends at birth. After the tykes are born, if they perish because their parents can’t afford appropriate medical care, that’s life in the big city. After all, we wouldn’t want socialized medicine, would we? It’s against the Bible or something. And then, of course, there’s the whole capital punishment thing. Eye for an eye, dontcha know?
And the people who live in a foreign country that the U.S. is mad at also have no right to life. Just ask any resident of Iraq or Afghanistan.
Sorry for the snark, but I’ve been supporting the struggle for women’s reproductive rights for over 40 years now, and I’m starting to get testy with the wowzers who seem to know what their God’s wishes are on just about everything (without any independent or objective grounds, mind you) and who want to impose their preferences on everybody in the whole fracking world.
Rant, rant, rant. Sorry.
Makarios, do not apologize for ranting. That’s what I was doing, after all. It’s not a pro-life movement in any sense, since it is anti-mother, and as you say, kids have a right to be born but no right to live afterward, apparently. The motto I was thinking of as I wrote this is, “Every sperm is sacred but what happens after is God’s business.”
Makarios and Hrafnkell… I salute you both!
Hrafnkell, your article was both well researched and heart-rending, and you, Makarios, have my appreciation in “a big way” for your understandings. Love and cyberhugs… I applaud your outspokenness…
Thank you, Diagonal. I appreciate it.
Excellent examples Hrafnkell! We know that when it comes to the Bible, Christians like to pick and choose what they want to believe. I say this because on the few occasions that I’ve mentioned some of these points, self avowed Christians simply say “Oh, that’s the Old Testament, that’s not what Jesus preached” On another note, God may have had a son but I find it far more interesting that God never had a daughter.
Martin…
Who can prove that my Goddess is not their God’s mother?
Just a thought and maybe a point to ponder? Have a good morning!
@Martin: thank you! Yes, it’s all picking and choosing and ignoring the other parts or as a last resort, explaining that if you’re not a believer you can’t really understand the Bible and that therefore any interpretation you offer is worthless. That’s always been my favorite.
@Diagonal: Proof! They will no doubt wave the Bible in your face as proof
Diagonal: Thank you. A good point to ponder but I concur with Hrafnkell. Who needs proof when you have faith and a thick book to clobber people with. I was thinking “…and God sent his only daughter to save his only son’s ass.” Nothing like the wrath of a woman (who can also work miracles) I’ll have to watch Monty Python’s Life of Brian again.
Yeah… love the Brits’ sense of irreverence and satire…