<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aheathensday.com/2009/08/global-warming.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aheathensday.com/2009/08/global-warming.html</link>
	<description>The Life and Thoughts of a Modern Day American Heathen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:11:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrafnkell Haraldsson</title>
		<link>http://aheathensday.com/2009/08/global-warming.html/comment-page-1#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrafnkell Haraldsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncajoe.org/domains/aheathensday.com/?p=1012#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>I agree Gran, and that is a movie I want to see. It&#039;s on my list but the list just keeps getting longer and I can&#039;t figure out how to add more hours to the day :(  On your advice, I&#039;ll move it up a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Gran, and that is a movie I want to see. It&#39;s on my list but the list just keeps getting longer and I can&#39;t figure out how to add more hours to the day <img src='http://aheathensday.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   On your advice, I&#39;ll move it up a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Granamyr/Danielle</title>
		<link>http://aheathensday.com/2009/08/global-warming.html/comment-page-1#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Granamyr/Danielle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncajoe.org/domains/aheathensday.com/?p=1012#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>While I think there are many issues related to this, I think a huge factor in it all is the Abrahamic view that this planet is *ours* and that we are the masters and mistresses of it, to do with it&#039;s inhabitants as we please. Rather than what I think is the more ancient view of humanity being a part of this world like a cog in a clock. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I love various quotes from, &quot;The Day the Earth Stood Still&quot; Klaatu is the alien.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Now, please; tell me why have you come to our planet.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;Klaatu: &quot;*Your* planet.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;Yes; this is our planet.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;Klaatu: &quot;No, it is not.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I also like:&lt;br /&gt;Klaatu: &quot;We can&#039;t risk the survival of this planet for the sake of one species.&quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Good movie if you haven&#039;t seen it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I think there are many issues related to this, I think a huge factor in it all is the Abrahamic view that this planet is *ours* and that we are the masters and mistresses of it, to do with it&#39;s inhabitants as we please. Rather than what I think is the more ancient view of humanity being a part of this world like a cog in a clock. </p>
<p>I love various quotes from, &quot;The Day the Earth Stood Still&quot; Klaatu is the alien.</p>
<p>&quot;Now, please; tell me why have you come to our planet.&quot;<br />Klaatu: &quot;*Your* planet.&quot;<br />&quot;Yes; this is our planet.&quot;<br />Klaatu: &quot;No, it is not.&quot;</p>
<p>I also like:<br />Klaatu: &quot;We can&#39;t risk the survival of this planet for the sake of one species.&quot; </p>
<p>Good movie if you haven&#39;t seen it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hrafnkell Haraldsson</title>
		<link>http://aheathensday.com/2009/08/global-warming.html/comment-page-1#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>Hrafnkell Haraldsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncajoe.org/domains/aheathensday.com/?p=1012#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>I thought it was good food for thought too, however much we may agree or disagree as to his findings. I think you bring up a very good point too, about how views of nature (and other things - marriage, anyone? Or sexuality?) change with time and with culture and even within a culture over time. People hearken back to the past with no clear understanding of what they&#039;re talking about. That study you speak of sounds VERY interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was good food for thought too, however much we may agree or disagree as to his findings. I think you bring up a very good point too, about how views of nature (and other things &#8211; marriage, anyone? Or sexuality?) change with time and with culture and even within a culture over time. People hearken back to the past with no clear understanding of what they&#39;re talking about. That study you speak of sounds VERY interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. V. Andersen</title>
		<link>http://aheathensday.com/2009/08/global-warming.html/comment-page-1#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator>N. V. Andersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uncajoe.org/domains/aheathensday.com/?p=1012#comment-1107</guid>
		<description>Very interesting article, thanks for bringing it to our attention. I agree that it&#039;s problematic to automatically assume that people in the ancient world revered nature in the same way that Pagans do today. While being animists, they were still interested in their own survival - more so than preserving natural &quot;purity&quot;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It seems to me that people back then were involved in nature in a very different way than we are today - not as something to be visited, protected and admired, but as the foundation of their livelihoods, the frame around their lives and simply the world they lived in.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I read an interesting study years ago - I&#039;ll try to find out exactly who wrote it. It was an art historian who had been studying medieval illuminations. While his study concerned a much later era in history, his conclusions were interesting. As is plain to see, nature is depicted in a very symbolic, nearly abstract way in medieval art - the reason, he proposed, was that people in the medieval world had no concept of nature as being something different, something apart from their daily lives, to be closely studied and depicted. In later art, especially from the industrial revolution and onwards, nature became the subject of both philosophical thought and very accurate artistic depictions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With these things in mind, it&#039;s clear to see that Pagans today cannot revere nature in the exact same way as our ancient predecessors - in an equally profound manner, perhaps, but not the same manner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article, thanks for bringing it to our attention. I agree that it&#39;s problematic to automatically assume that people in the ancient world revered nature in the same way that Pagans do today. While being animists, they were still interested in their own survival &#8211; more so than preserving natural &quot;purity&quot;.</p>
<p>It seems to me that people back then were involved in nature in a very different way than we are today &#8211; not as something to be visited, protected and admired, but as the foundation of their livelihoods, the frame around their lives and simply the world they lived in.</p>
<p>I read an interesting study years ago &#8211; I&#39;ll try to find out exactly who wrote it. It was an art historian who had been studying medieval illuminations. While his study concerned a much later era in history, his conclusions were interesting. As is plain to see, nature is depicted in a very symbolic, nearly abstract way in medieval art &#8211; the reason, he proposed, was that people in the medieval world had no concept of nature as being something different, something apart from their daily lives, to be closely studied and depicted. In later art, especially from the industrial revolution and onwards, nature became the subject of both philosophical thought and very accurate artistic depictions. </p>
<p>With these things in mind, it&#39;s clear to see that Pagans today cannot revere nature in the exact same way as our ancient predecessors &#8211; in an equally profound manner, perhaps, but not the same manner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
